Korean legal AI training & evaluation data
Legal Q&A on fictional cases with cited statutes and precedents, plus answer evaluation.
PRACTICE 02 · LEGAL & FINANCIAL EXPERT DATA
We design and propose training, evaluation and validation data for Korean legal and accounting/finance AI against each project’s criteria.
PROPOSED SCOPE
This is our proposed scope. Task types, volume, timelines and quality criteria are set in a project contract.
Legal Q&A on fictional cases with cited statutes and precedents, plus answer evaluation.
Reference answers and validation for accounting treatment, tax/financial calculations and report interpretation tasks.
Rubric-based rating and ranking of model answers for accuracy, grounding and risk.
Identify citation, calculation and factual errors and record the basis for each correction.
Design fictional contract, dispute and financial cases without any real client data.
Project-specific credential checks, double review and inter-rater agreement management.
EXPERT SOURCING
We have no contracted expert pool today. Recruitment and data production start per project once the buyer’s requirements and contract are confirmed.
We state exam results, registration (Korean Bar Association, Financial Services Commission) and practical experience separately, and never present exam passers as registered attorneys or CPAs.
Separately from credentials, we verify practical experience (duration and practice area).
We check evidence against the level the buyer requires (licensed, exam-passed, related degree, etc.) and do not assign anyone who falls short.
We do not use real matters or client files; confidentiality and conflict checks are conditions of participation.
We have no legal/financial data delivery record, contracts or contracted experts. JUNIA does not provide legal, accounting or tax advice; the data is for AI training and evaluation only.
START A CONVERSATION